factbox-shipping-firms-react-to-houthi-attacks-in-the-red-sea-by-reutersFactbox-Shipping Firms React To Houthi Attacks In The Red Sea By Reuters

Factbox-Shipping firms react to Houthi attacks in the Red Sea © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Containers are seen stacked up on the container ship CMA CGM Benjamin Franklin at the port of Antwerp, Belgium September 23, 2022. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo

(Reuters) – Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen have stepped up attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, impacting a shipping route vital to East-West trade.

In response, some shipping companies have instructed vessels to instead sail around southern Africa, a slower and therefore more expensive route.

The U.S. and Britain launched dozens of air strikes against Houthi military targets overnight on Jan. 11 and 12 in retaliation for the attacks, widening regional conflict stemming from Israel’s war in Gaza.

Below are actions taken by companies (in alphabetical order):

C.H. ROBINSON

The global logistics group said on Dec. 22 it had rerouted more than 25 vessels around the Cape of Good Hope over the previous week, and that number would likely grow.

“Blank sailings and rate increases are expected to continue across many trades into Q1 of 2024,” it added.

CMA CGM

The French shipping firm said on Jan. 5 it had not changed its plans announced in December to gradually raise the number of vessels transiting through the Suez Canal.

It had previously rerouted several vessels via the Cape of Good Hope.

EURONAV

The Belgian oil tanker firm said on Dec. 18 it would avoid the Red Sea until further notice.

EVERGREEN

The Taiwanese container shipping line said on Dec. 18 its vessels on regional services to Red Sea ports would sail to safe waters nearby and wait for further notification, while ships scheduled to pass through the Red Sea would be rerouted around Africa. It also temporarily stopped accepting Israeli cargo.

FRONTLINE

The Norway-based oil tanker group on Dec. 18 said its vessels would avoid the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.

GRAM CAR CARRIERS

The Norwegian auto carrier said on Dec. 21 its vessels were restricted from passing through the Red Sea.

HAFNIA

The Norwegian shipping firm said on Jan. 12 it has halted all ships heading towards or within the Bab al-Mandab Strait, following an advisory from the Combined Maritime Forces to stay clear of the region after the U.S.-British air strikes in Yemen.

HAPAG-LLOYD

The German container shipping line on Jan. 15 said it would continue to divert vessels away from the Suez Canal and around Africa. It will take next decisions on Jan. 22.

“We are not commenting on the specific incidents that occurred last night,” a company spokesperson said on Jan. 12 regarding the U.S-British air strikes, adding Hapag-Lloyd welcomed measures to secure safe passage, as diversions have led to tens of millions of euros in additional monthly costs.

HMM

The South Korean container shipper said on Dec. 19 it had ordered its ships which would normally use the Suez Canal to reroute around Africa.

HOEGH AUTOLINERS

The Norwegian auto carrier said on Dec. 20 it would stop sailing via the Red Sea after the Norwegian Maritime Authority raised its alert for the southern part of the sea to the highest level.

KLAVENESS COMBINATION CARRIERS

The Norway-based fleet operator said on Dec. 28 it was unlikely to sail any of its vessels in the Red Sea unless the situation improves.

KUEHNE + NAGEL

“Even if from today forward the Bab al-Mandeb Strait was to become safe and secure for transit, we expect it will take a minimum of two months before vessels could assume normal rotational patterns,” Michael Aldwell, executive VP for sea logistics at the Swiss logistics firm, said on Jan. 12.

MAERSK

The Danish shipping group said on Jan. 5 it would suspend Red Sea traffic “for the foreseeable future”.

Following the U.S.-British strikes against Houthi military targets, Maersk on Jan. 12 said it hopes international interventions and a larger naval presence in the area will eventually lead to a resumption of maritime commerce through the strait.

On Jan. 16, it sent two container ships through the Red Sea carrying goods for the U.S. military and government. The vessels sailed in the “near proximity of U.S. Navy assets, which have reduced the risks to the crews and cargo”, Maersk told Reuters.

MSC

Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) said on Dec. 16 its ships would not transit through the Suez Canal, with some already rerouted via the Cape of Good Hope.

NIPPON YUSEN

Japan’s biggest shipper by sales suspended navigation through the Red Sea for all vessels it operates, a spokesperson told Reuters on Jan. 16. It has also instructed vessels near the Red Sea to wait in safe waters and is considering route change.

OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS

Ocean Network Express, a joint venture between Japan’s Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and Nippon Yusen, said on Dec. 19 it would reroute vessels from the Red Sea to the Cape of Good Hope or temporarily pause journeys and move to safe areas.

OOCL

The Hong Kong-headquartered container group said on Dec. 21 it had instructed its vessels to either divert their route away from the Red Sea or suspend sailing. The company, owned by Orient Overseas (International) Ltd, also stopped accepting cargo to and from Israel until further notice.

TORM

The Danish oil tanker group said on Jan. 12 it has decided to pause all transits through the southern Red Sea for now.

WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN

The Norwegian shipping group said on Dec. 19 it would halt Red Sea transits until further notice. Rerouting vessels around Africa will add 1-2 weeks to voyage durations, it said.

YANG MING MARINE TRANSPORT

The Taiwanese container shipping company said on Dec. 18 it would divert ships sailing through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden via the Cape of Good Hope for the next two weeks.

By admin

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *